Template talk:Monster
|
|
|
|---|---|
 |
|
| Wild HP: | 9 |
| Wild MP: | 0 |
| Wild Magic Defense: | Unknown |
| Type: | Fire |
| Gold: | 2 |
| Experience: | 1 |
| Steal: | {{{Steal}}} |
| Found: | Ennar |
|
|
|
The layout looks a lot better than the previous black box. However, there's a lot more useful information than just statistics, like strategy for dealing with certain monsters, and what they do. So either way, you'll need to design the page to take that into consideration.
Also, it might not be a good idea to include the Quick navigation template with the template, so that we can have pages like the catacombs boss fight include all of the monster information together(The wraith thing or whatever it is, with all of the rods).
At first I was thinking that if you had a side-section to it for a description on right side, you wouldn't have to center it, you could just have the text expand outwards to the right, and for multi-monster fights you could include all the monsters downwards, however it might also be good to have extra information extend downwards, and to just center the monster template with the Quick Template, so it's centered. Then when there is more than one monster in a fight(like the wraith) you could include them on the page side-by-side, in the same order they are in the actual fight.
On a final note in this all over the place rambling, it might be nice to have a box around the monster name at the top extended off the main box of statistics, with a light background color to make it stand out more. Since the border is a dark-blue, a lighter blue would do the trick.
Mikau 15:53, 20 March 2011 (CDT)
Responce
1. For monster pages it's probably best if people just list the HP/Exp/Gold and spell list for each monster, and not the more detailed stats. Those won't mean much to the average player anyway, and they're in constant flux. I also totally agree with him in that we don't need detailed stats
2. The quick template is in the monster template and we could center the monster page but i don't know if it will look too out of place. (hates centered pages) ill fool with the centering and see if its alright.
3. IMO we should not post boss information so multiple monsters in one wiki is not necessary and i think it will look better downwards even if we did.
4. If you want to fiddle with the top name you can go ahead but I think it looks good as it is.
5. please send me a PM on the forums under Mur because I almost did not see this.
Mur 20:19, 20 March 2011 (CDT)
Reply
1. So did I when he told me they were in constant flux, I had completely forgotten about that part.
2. What I mean is that we should manually include the quick template on the page ourselves. It would have removed the need for Template:Weapon!. Mostly so in the future we can have monsters in a horizontal pattern across the page.
3. Boss information is important, why would we not include it? That's like saying we won't include the longer more complicated words in the dictionary.
Mikau 00:37, 21 March 2011 (CDT)
Does not look bad horizontal. Mur 20:19, 20 March 2011 (CDT)
Horizontal Test
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
